I am not a defender of the Bible, but an analyst of it, due to serious contradictions. When false witnesses recount their actions, one of the clearest signs of their lies is the inconsistency of their own words. They fear reasoned debate; that's why they flee from it. They demand submission through blind faith, because reason will never defend them. They demonize their critics, attack those who speak coherently, but never refute their arguments, because they know they are irrefutable. Thinking about whether it's truly possible to walk on water makes you doubt, and doubt—according to them—separates you from God. Thus, they teach you not to think, to believe without reason. Because a mind that doesn't question obeys… and one that obeys without thinking is the easiest to deceive. "As we can infer after reading Isaiah 63:3-5, Isaiah 11:1-5, and Revelation 19:11-19, doesn't the rider on the white horse advocate 'an eye for an eye'?" If you acknowledge that this is the case, then who is this long-haired man who strangely resembles the Greek god Zeus and brings a doctrine of loving one's enemies—a doctrine that, curiously, is a phrase coined by a Greek named Cleobulus of Lindos? Don't you think he will fall into the sea of fantasies he invented, which were then passed off as God's words? A faithful friend deserves the love of the faithful, but does an enemy also deserve it? Do you think that was actually said by the faithful friend, or by the unfaithful Roman Empire that persecuted him? Can the unjust become friends with the righteous? If so, why does Daniel 12:10 say what it says, and why doesn't the rider on the white horse make peace with them instead of waging war against them? If I've made you think… the false witnesses I mentioned at the beginning didn't like that. Read and understand https://shewillfind.me/the-principal-message-el-mensaje-principal/ To say that even one of the saints chose celibacy and called it a “gift” is a vile slander of the serpent incarnated in the false saints that Rome secretly introduced to destroy the true religion. I will not consent to evil thoughts, such as those that might make me believe it is impossible to successfully refute that slander of the Roman Empire and its false saints, who tell us that the glory of the reward in the kingdom of heaven will consist of righteous men alone, instead of being united in marriage with women, according to the accusation in Matthew 22:30. Nor will I accept that lie which claims that the saints would renounce the glory of marriage with women in order to embrace celibacy (1 Corinthians 7:1 and 1 Corinthians 7:9-10). Nor will I accept the slander that says they conceived impure thoughts, like those in Matthew 5:11 and 1 Timothy 4:1-6, where they are accused of promoting the consumption of foods that God called unclean and forbade forever, such as pork, shellfish, or bat meat. Nor will I allow people to believe lies like those in Luke 23:34 and Ephesians 3:7, which tell us that the righteous loved their enemies and died preaching undeserved love. In this sense, if that were true, why do they ask for vengeance against those who killed them in Revelation 6? There is a direct contradiction between Acts 7:57–60 and Revelation 6:9–10, because one of the two is the lie of their enemy. If God decreed “an eye for an eye” against the enemies of the righteous in Deuteronomy 19:20–21, it is because that is justice, since justice means giving each one what they deserve — and the Roman Empire was anything but just. This blog has two domains that evoke these messages: “she will find me” and “the virgin will believe me,” because I want to reflect my desires and, at the same time, defend the desires of righteous men, clearly expressed here: 1 Corinthians 11:7 – The woman is the glory of man. Leviticus 21:13–15 – He shall take a virgin woman as wife. He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a dishonored one, or a prostitute, but shall take from his own people a virgin for a wife, so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, Jehovah, am the one who sanctifies them. Unlike the impostors, who worship the same ancient Roman gods — Mars, the Sun, Artemis, Jupiter — but through almost identical statues and under other names, the true saints considered finding a good wife a blessing: Proverbs 18:22 – He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from Jehovah. The Bible contradicts the Bible because Rome contradicted the religion it persecuted and changed many things, calling much of what was good the “Old Testament” and its Hellenism the “New Testament.” The justified “eye for an eye” they replaced with “offer the other eye to your enemy,” for the enemy never changed; he merely disguised himself as a saint through names that were never his. Psalm 118:18–20 18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death. 19 Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them and praise Jehovah. 20 This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.
Chinese government, I advise you not to allow false prophets to spread lies in your country, so that what happens in these lands where they have influence does not happen to you.
Despite allowing himself to be robbed, a cowardly assailant kills a 30-year-old man by shooting him in the head from behind! Death penalty now.
The last straw!! In Peru, a man did not resist the theft of his things, but they killed him anyway! Is it a sin to wish for the death penalty? No.
The death penalty must be legalized urgently within a fair legal framework that is corruption-proof, in which, for example, a false witness who seeks to kill an innocent person with his false accusation, or a judge who seeks to free an extortionist or a murderer from death, is also sentenced to death, and a righteous executioner should never be confused with a murderer sentenced to death with justice, because it never was, is, or will be the same, even though the mafias of false prophets, successors of the Roman persecutors, have wanted to equate them by opposing justice, as unjust as they are. Only in this way, and with the help of the advanced forensic science that we have, would we ensure quick and fair sentences. The lack of the death penalty is not working, we see how extortions are increasing, extortionists kill without fear because there is no death penalty. El Salvador with its mega-prison is only saving the problem by not ending it. It is more expensive to keep extortionists in prisons than to shoot them. Bad people don’t change, and that’s why those who didn’t respect the lives of others and took them away unjustly don’t deserve to have their lives respected. Almost all of those captured are repeat offenders. The good and the bad make mistakes sometimes, but that doesn’t mean they’re not good or bad. How do we make sure that the right to life is respected if we don’t condemn those who don’t do it to death? Keeping them in jail is costly, the death penalty is the just punishment that those who kill unjustly deserve. And it would be fair if only those who defend the lives of these murderers were their victims and not those who wish them the death penalty. Many use God as an excuse to say no to justice, many use God as a pretext to say no to the death penalty. I talk about this in that video. God dictated the death penalty with justice, but in the Bible you will find contradictory passages in both the New and the Old Testament, and the explanation for that is one: Once the Romans took control of Jerusalem and killed those who had the religion of Moses, they dedicated themselves to destroying the foundations of the religion of the Jews, and so they created the content of the Bible, based on a mixture of Greek phrases, pro-Hellenistic messages that contradict dogmas of the religion persecuted by them, the remains of the messages of the persecuted religion that remain in the Bible contradict the messages grafted by the unjust Romans. I talk about some of these contradictions in this short video. And if we refer to messages in the Bible that do not deny either false prophets or the righteous, then: If God had created the wicked capable of becoming good, then God would have dictated conversion or therapies of insertion into society for them, and not the death penalty, and in that case this commandment would have been meaningless: Numbers 35:33 You shall not defile the land where you live (with murders), for the blood shed will make the land unclean, and only the blood of the one who shed it will be purified from the blood shed in it (with executions). If the wicked could become righteous, this message would be false: Daniel 12:10 Many will be cleansed, and made white, and purified; the wicked will act wickedly, and none of the wicked will understand, but those who are wise will understand. Pope Francis opposes the death penalty saying that it encourages revenge and not justice, he denies the truth, as the Roman persecutors did, if there were no revenge friendly to justice, what does this mean?: Psalm 58:10 The righteous will rejoice when he sees vengeance; he will wash his feet in the blood of the wicked. 11 Then a man will say, Surely there is a reward for the righteous; Surely there is a God who judges on earth. If we were to leave all that is justice to God and sit idly by without acting as his instruments of justice, What does this order from God mean?: Revelation 18:6 Render to her as she has given you, and pay her double according to her works; in the cup in which she has mixed drink, mix for her double. 7 As much as she has glorified herself and lived deliciously, give her so much torment and crying, for she says in her heart, I sit as a queen, and am no widow, and shall not see mourning; 8 therefore in one day her plagues will come, death, mourning, and famine, and she will be burned with fire; for mighty is the Lord God, who judges her. https://penademuerteya.comhttps://ntiend.me
She will find me; the virgin and righteous woman of the gate of Jehovah will indeed believe me. 